No statute; case law
Landlord duty to mitigate after an early lease break in De
Not automatically. A lease acceleration clause can demand all remaining rent at once, but no Colorado statute we read requires a landlord to re-rent. Colorado courts apply general contract mitigation principles, so a landlord who does nothing risks a reduced damages award. C.R.S. § 38-12-801 separately voids some lease terms. Check the current statutes before relying on this.

Quick Summary - What You Need to Know

  • No Colorado statute we read requires a residential landlord to re-rent after you break a lease.
  • Colorado courts apply general contract mitigation principles, so a landlord who does nothing risks a reduced damages award.
  • C.R.S. § 38-12-801 voids some lease terms, including penalties tied to an eviction notice and one-way attorney-fee clauses.
  • Because the rule is judge-made, outcomes vary more than in states with a mitigation statute.
  • Denver adds nothing on rent acceleration or mitigation. State law and Colorado case law control.

Step by step

How it plays out

  1. You leave earlyClause demands remaining rentAn acceleration clause can make every remaining month due at once. It is a claim, not a judgment.
  2. Unit sits emptyRe-renting effort gets weighedColorado courts apply general contract mitigation principles. A landlord who does nothing to re-rent risks a reduced damages award.
  3. Landlord suesA judge decides the amountThe clause does not collect itself. A landlord who wants that money has to sue and convince a Colorado judge.

Copy and send: When your landlord bills you for the remaining rent after you moved out early

Ask for an itemized statement

Fill in the brackets and keep a copy of what you send.

How Colorado compares

Landlord duty to mitigate after an early lease break, state by state

Landlord duty to mitigate after an early lease break by stateEach square is a state; Colorado is outlined.Alabama: guide coming soonALAlaska: guide coming soonAKArizonaAZNo figureArkansas: guide coming soonARCaliforniaCANo figureColoradoCONo figureConnecticut: guide coming soonCTDelaware: guide coming soonDEDistrict of ColumbiaDCNo figureFloridaFLNo figureGeorgiaGANo figureHawaii: guide coming soonHIIdaho: guide coming soonIDIllinoisILNo figureIndianaINNo figureIowa: guide coming soonIAKansas: guide coming soonKSKentuckyKYNo figureLouisiana: guide coming soonLAMaine: guide coming soonMEMarylandMDNo figureMassachusettsMANo figureMichiganMINo figureMinnesotaMNNo figureMississippi: guide coming soonMSMissouriMONo figureMontana: guide coming soonMTNebraska: guide coming soonNENevadaNVNo figureNew Hampshire: guide coming soonNHNew JerseyNJNo figureNew Mexico: guide coming soonNMNew YorkNYNo figureNorth CarolinaNCNo figureNorth Dakota: guide coming soonNDOhioOHNo figureOklahomaOKNo figureOregonORNo figurePennsylvaniaPANo figureRhode Island: guide coming soonRISouth Carolina: guide coming soonSCSouth Dakota: guide coming soonSDTennesseeTNNo figureTexasTXNo figureUtah: guide coming soonUTVermont: guide coming soonVTVirginia: guide coming soonVAWashingtonWANo figureWest Virginia: guide coming soonWVWisconsinWINo figureWyoming: guide coming soonWY

No figureGuide coming soonYou are here

See all 26 cities as a chart

Landlord duty to mitigate after an early lease break

Same clause, 26 cities, different rules. Tap any city for its own guide.

Austin, Texas
Mandatory, non-waivable
Los Angeles, California
Mandatory, tenant proves
New York City, New York
Mandatory, non-waivable
Miami, Florida
No duty to re-rent
Chicago, Illinois
Mandatory statewide
Seattle, Washington
Mandatory on abandonment
Denver, Colorado
No statute; case law
Phoenix, Arizona
Mandatory after abandonment
Atlanta, Georgia
Likely no duty
Nashville, Tennessee
Mandatory in large counties
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
No duty to re-rent
Portland, Oregon
Mandatory on abandonment
Boston, Massachusetts
No statute; 93A limits
Las Vegas, Nevada
Mandatory on abandonment
Washington, District of Columbia
Mandatory, actual damages
Columbus, Ohio
No statute; case law
Newark, New Jersey
Mandatory, landlord proves
Detroit, Michigan
Non-waivable by lease
Charlotte, North Carolina
Case law; tenant proves
Baltimore, Maryland
Mandatory, non-waivable
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Mandatory on abandonment
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Mandatory; acceleration voids lease
Kansas City, Missouri
No general duty; deposit rule
Indianapolis, Indiana
Case law duty to re-let
Louisville, Kentucky
Mandatory on abandonment
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Mandatory statewide

Figures are the state rule, or the stronger city ordinance where one exists. Verify the current law for your own situation before relying on it.

Understanding the Lease Acceleration Clause

This page is for Denver renters whose lease has an acceleration clause: the paragraph that makes all the remaining rent due at once if you leave early. The bill can look final, but it is a claim.

In Colorado, what a landlord can actually collect turns on case law and the facts of your move-out, including whether anyone tried to re-rent the unit. Check the current Colorado statutes and case law before you rely on any of it.

What renters assume

If my lease says all remaining rent is due when I leave early, I owe every month the day I hand back the keys.

What is actually true

Not by default. The clause is a claim, not a judgment. A Colorado court weighs whether the landlord tried to re-rent, and a landlord who did nothing risks a reduced award.

Colorado is the blank space on this chart. Washington, Illinois, Arizona, and New York all wrote the duty into statute; Florida wrote the opposite; Colorado wrote neither, which means outcomes here vary more than almost anywhere else on the list.

Clause decoder

Rent Acceleration Clause Example - What the Wording Looks Like in Denver, CO

The sample clause below is real lease language - a court quoted it word for word, and then ruled on it. What the judge decided is at the bottom of this block.

Real clause - quoted in a published court opinion

Find the equivalent paragraph in your own lease and read the two side by side. The wording will differ; the moving parts rarely do.

The acceleration paragraph from the opinion. Read it as a partial paragraph: one more sentence, about late fees and interest on accelerated amounts, follows in the original and is not printed here:

If any monthly installment under this agreement is not paid when due and remains unpaid after a date specified by a notice to Tenant, the entire principal rent amount owed for the full lease term shall at once become due and payable at the option of the Landlord and judgment may be had for all said amounts due. The foregoing provision shall not relieve the Landlord of its obligation to mitigate damages. In the event the rental premises is re-rented to another for full value prior to expiration of the lease term, Landlord shall file Notice of Partial Satisfaction of any judgment entered to the extent of the third party rental agreement.

[…]

Quoted from the published opinion in Summers v. Crestview Apartments, 2010 MT 164, 357 Mont. 123, 236 P.3d 586 (No. DA 09-0489). Judicial opinions are not subject to copyright; the lease language is reproduced in limited part for commentary under 17 U.S.C. § 107.

What the 4 highlighted phrases mean
1

“under this agreement”

In Colorado the agreement carries more weight than it does in the states on this page that write the duty into their code. Texas and New York both do, and both void a lease term that waives it, so there the statute settles the question before the lease is opened. Our Colorado record identifies no such statute for residential tenancies. That leaves the paragraph you signed as the first document anyone reads, with general contract mitigation principles from Colorado's courts shaping it from outside - and check the current statutes before relying on it.

Tenant-favourable“The terms of this Agreement are subject to all rights Tenant has under Colorado law”
What this lease said“under this agreement”
Landlord-favourable“This Agreement is the entire understanding and no rule outside it shall limit Landlord’s remedies”
2

“The foregoing provision”

In Texas or New York this sentence is surplus, because the duty it concedes is statutory and cannot be waived there. In Colorado it is worth more, because it is a promise inside your contract rather than a restatement of a code section - and our Colorado record locates the mitigation rule in general contract principles and case law rather than in the landlord-tenant statutes. A lease that contains this sentence and a lease that omits it are not obviously in the same position here.

Tenant-favourable“Landlord’s duty to mitigate is an independent obligation and survives any default by Tenant”
What this lease said“The foregoing provision”
Landlord-favourable“The mitigation reference in this paragraph is precatory and creates no obligation enforceable by Tenant”
3

“for full value”

Nothing in the lease obliges the landlord to accept less than the old rent, and no Colorado statute in our record supplies that obligation. What our Colorado record does supply is the consequence of inaction: Colorado courts apply general contract mitigation principles, so a landlord who does nothing at all risks a reduced damages award. The argument is available. It is simply built out of case law rather than out of a section number you can point at.

See the example
Because the rule is judge-made, the facts do more work here than any citation does. Dates, listings, asking rents and the day a new tenant moved in are what a Colorado court would be looking at.
Tenant-favourable“Landlord shall offer the premises at a rent no higher than the market rate then prevailing”
What this lease said“for full value”
Landlord-favourable“Landlord shall have no obligation to relet at any rent below the rent reserved in this Lease”
4

“of any judgment entered”

Judgments are where Colorado does have a statute pointed at lease terms. C.R.S. § 38-12-801 voids several kinds of clause outright, including penalties tied to an eviction notice or an eviction action and one-way attorney-fee clauses - the terms that make the process itself expensive. Our Colorado record for that section is about those voided terms and does not reach the mitigation question, which is why the rest of this page rests on case law - but it is the provision to read next to anything in your lease that adds a charge because a filing happened.

Tenant-favourable“No fee, penalty or charge shall arise from the service of a notice or the filing of an action”
What this lease said“of any judgment entered”
Landlord-favourable“Tenant shall pay a $250 administrative charge on service of any notice, plus Landlord’s fees in any action”
What the court did with it

The Montana Supreme Court struck this paragraph down, and its conclusion is one sentence: “Thus, we conclude that the accelerated rent provision is unconscionable and therefore unenforceable.” The tenants had moved out of their apartment on October 13, 2006, and Crestview answered with a Statement of Deductions from the Security Deposit charging rent through the end of the lease in June - $6,505.75 billed against a $2,170 deposit. Two reasons carried the court. Acceleration undermines the landlord's duty to mitigate and reduces the incentive to re-rent promptly, because a landlord already holding a judgment for the whole term has little reason to fill the unit. And Crestview drafted the lease while these tenants had no meaningful choice and no opportunity to negotiate any of it. The case was reversed and remanded, and two justices wrote separately - their objection being that the majority had gone as far as treating acceleration clauses as unenforceable in themselves. So read the holding narrowly, as the majority wrote it: this provision, in this residential lease, unconscionable and unenforceable. It is a Montana decision and it binds no other state's courts. What travels is the reasoning, and the reasoning is about mitigation - which is exactly the question the statute in your own city's decode answers.

How this state's law treats this clause
In Colorado the answer does not come out of the landlord-tenant statutes at all. Our Colorado record finds no statute imposing an express duty to mitigate on a residential landlord after a tenant breaks a lease. What applies instead are general contract mitigation principles from the courts, so a landlord who does nothing risks a reduced damages award, and because the rule is judge-made rather than statutory the outcomes vary more than in states with an express mitigation statute. Our Colorado record carries no statutory citation on this question, so read the current statutes and recent Colorado decisions for yourself rather than treating any of this as settled. The record's citation is:

One court, one lease, one state. That answer is not automatically yours, and your lease may be worded to land differently. Use this to know what to look for and what to ask - your state's tenant hotline or a local tenant attorney can answer it for your document.

Colorado Law on Lease Acceleration Clause

The law in Colorado
  • No Colorado statute we read imposes an express duty to mitigate on a residential landlord after a tenant breaks a lease.
  • Colorado courts apply general contract mitigation principles, so a landlord who does nothing risks a reduced damages award.
  • C.R.S. § 38-12-801 separately voids several lease terms, including penalties tied to an eviction notice or action and one-way attorney-fee clauses.
  • Because the rule is judge-made rather than statutory, outcomes vary more than in states with an express mitigation statute.

Verify the current text in your state's landlord-tenant statutes.

Colorado answers this question in court, not in a statute. No Colorado statute we read imposes an express duty to mitigate, meaning a duty to try to cut the loss by re-renting, on a residential landlord after a tenant breaks a lease.

  • Case law. Colorado courts apply general contract mitigation principles. A landlord who does nothing to re-rent risks a reduced damages award.
  • C.R.S. § 38-12-801. This section separately voids several lease terms, including penalties tied to an eviction notice or action and one-way attorney-fee clauses.
  • Outcomes vary. Because the rule is judge-made rather than statutory, results vary more than in states with an express mitigation statute.

The Colorado sections we read set no formula for damages. Confirm the current Colorado statutes and case law before you rely on any of this.

What's Specific to Denver

Denver adds nothing on rent acceleration or mitigation. State law and Colorado case law control, whether you are leaving a Cap Hill walk-up or a new build in RiNo.

That leaves the lease you signed, and a judge's view of what happened after you left, as what shapes the bill. Read what your lease says about re-renting and how damages are calculated, and keep dated proof of your move-out.

Does the lease say how damages get calculated?

A fair one shows the math and credits rent from a new tenant. The Colorado sections we read set no formula.

Does it promise reasonable efforts to re-rent?

Good sign. That gives you a contract term to enforce, since no Colorado statute we read creates that duty.

Does it demand all remaining rent immediately?

Red flag. A demand on day one ignores re-renting, which Colorado judges weigh under general contract principles.

Does it make you pay the landlord's attorney fees?

Push back if it is one-way. C.R.S. § 38-12-801 voids one-way attorney-fee clauses.

Red Flags to Watch Out For

  • All remaining rent due at once

    The clause bills every unexpired month the day you hand over keys. Ask what was done to re-rent the unit before you treat that total as owed.

  • No duty to re-rent language

    Wording saying the owner need not look for a new tenant. In Colorado the re-rent question is argued under contract law, so show it to a lawyer.

  • Acceleration stacked on re-letting fees

    All remaining rent and a separate lease-break or re-letting charge. Ask in writing which amounts are credited against the other before paying.

  • Charges tied to an eviction notice

    A fee that fires when a notice is posted on your door. C.R.S. § 38-12-801 voids penalties tied to an eviction notice or action.

  • Deposit kept plus accelerated rent

    Your full deposit is kept and the balance still arrives. Ask for a written itemization showing exactly what was credited against what.

Your Rights as a Denver Tenant

  • Mitigation still gets argued

    If your landlord does nothing to re-rent, you can argue under contract mitigation principles that the damages award should be reduced.

  • Some lease terms are void

    C.R.S. § 38-12-801 voids penalties tied to an eviction notice or action and one-way attorney-fee clauses.

  • A judge decides, not the lease

    An acceleration clause does not collect itself. A landlord who wants that money has to sue and convince a Colorado judge.

  • Proof, not a printed number

    Ask for the re-rental date, the new rent and receipts before you treat the balance on a statement as owed.

What To Do - Step by Step

1

Find the acceleration paragraph

Search your lease for 'accelerate', 'all remaining rent' or 'balance of the term'. Copy the exact wording; that is where your landlord's number starts.

2

Give dated written notice

Email it and mail it, so your move-out date is one you can prove.

3

Photograph everything, return keys

Document each room and hand back keys on a date you can prove. Rent and damage disputes are settled from the same paper trail.

4

Track the relisting weekly

Check Zillow, Apartments.com and the building's own site. Screenshot the date and price the moment your old unit reappears.

5

Ask for an itemized statement

Ask in writing for the re-rental date, the new rent and receipts for actual costs. Do not pay a lump sum with no math behind it.

6

Get Colorado tenant help

Call Colorado Legal Services or the Colorado Poverty Law Project before signing a repayment plan. The rule here is judge-made, so early advice helps.

Why renters trust LeaseDecoded

Read at the sourceEvery statute is read in its published text, on the state's own site where that site can be reached.
Real court rulingsLease wording on our pages is quoted from published court opinions, with what the judge decided.
Dated and re-checkedEach guide shows when it was last reviewed, and we correct it when the law changes.
Free, no sign-upEvery guide and calculator is free. It is not legal advice; each guide says where to get that.

Frequently Asked Questions

can my landlord make me pay the rest of my lease in denver
They can demand it under an acceleration clause, the paragraph making all remaining rent due at once. Collecting is another step: Colorado courts apply general contract mitigation principles, so a landlord who never tried to re-rent risks a reduced award.
does my landlord have to re-rent my apartment in colorado
No Colorado statute we read says so. Any duty to try re-renting after you leave early comes from case law and general contract principles, so outcomes vary more than in states with a mitigation statute. Check current Colorado law first.
is a lease acceleration clause legal in colorado
Our record of Colorado law does not answer that directly. It finds no statute on a landlord's duty to re-rent, and C.R.S. § 38-12-801 voids some lease terms, such as one-way attorney-fee clauses. Have a lawyer read your clause.
what happens if i just move out early in denver
Expect a demand for the remaining rent under the acceleration clause, plus fees. Denver adds nothing to the state rules, so document your move-out, watch for the relisting, and get advice before paying a lump sum.

Was this guide helpful?Your answer is anonymous and helps us fix what is unclear.

Legal Disclaimer: This guide is for general educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Information reflects general Colorado and Denver law as of October 2026 but may not reflect recent changes. Consult a licensed attorney in Colorado for advice about your specific situation.