$100,000 typical
Typical required liability coverage in Nashville
No section we read in Tennessee's landlord and tenant act requires renters insurance or sets a coverage amount. A Nashville landlord can still require a policy in the lease, typically $100,000 in liability. What the clause cannot do is make you cover the landlord's own liability: Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-203 voids that.

Quick Summary - What You Need to Know

  • No Tennessee section we read requires renters insurance or names a coverage amount.
  • A landlord may still require a policy by lease; $100,000 in liability is a typical Nashville ask.
  • Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-203 voids clauses excusing the landlord or making you indemnify it for its own liability.
  • The state act covers counties over 75,000 people, which includes Davidson County.
  • Nashville cannot add its own rule: § 66-28-102 preempts local landlord-tenant ordinances.

Copy and send: Before you sign the lease, after reading the insurance clause and the sentences around it

Questions about the insurance clause

Fill in the brackets and keep a copy of what you send.

How Tennessee compares

Typical required liability coverage, state by state

Typical required liability coverage by stateEach square is a state; Tennessee is outlined.Alabama: guide coming soonALAlaska: guide coming soonAKArizonaAZ$100kArkansas: guide coming soonARCaliforniaCA$100kColoradoCO$100kConnecticut: guide coming soonCTDelaware: guide coming soonDEDistrict of ColumbiaDCNo figureFloridaFL$100kGeorgiaGA$100kHawaii: guide coming soonHIIdaho: guide coming soonIDIllinoisIL$100kIndianaINNo figureIowa: guide coming soonIAKansas: guide coming soonKSKentuckyKYNo figureLouisiana: guide coming soonLAMaine: guide coming soonMEMarylandMDNo figureMassachusettsMANo figureMichiganMINo figureMinnesotaMNNo figureMississippi: guide coming soonMSMissouriMONo figureMontana: guide coming soonMTNebraska: guide coming soonNENevadaNVNo figureNew Hampshire: guide coming soonNHNew JerseyNJNo figureNew Mexico: guide coming soonNMNew YorkNY$100kNorth CarolinaNCNo figureNorth Dakota: guide coming soonNDOhioOHNo figureOklahoma: guide coming soonOKOregonOR$100kPennsylvaniaPANo figureRhode Island: guide coming soonRISouth Carolina: guide coming soonSCSouth Dakota: guide coming soonSDTennesseeTN$100kTexasTX$100kUtah: guide coming soonUTVermont: guide coming soonVTVirginia: guide coming soonVAWashingtonWA$100kWest Virginia: guide coming soonWVWisconsinWINo figureWyoming: guide coming soonWY

$100kNo figureGuide coming soonYou are here

See all 25 cities as a chart

Typical required liability coverage

Same clause, 25 cities, different rules. Tap any city for its own guide.

Austin, Texas
$100,000 typical
Los Angeles, California
$100,000statutory
New York City, New York
$100,000 typical
Miami, Florida
$100,000 typical
Chicago, Illinois
$100,000 typical
Seattle, Washington
$100,000 typical
Denver, Colorado
$100,000 typical
Phoenix, Arizona
$100,000 typical
Atlanta, Georgia
$100,000 typical
Nashville, Tennessee
$100,000 typical
Portland, Oregon
$100,000 cap
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
No state requirement
Boston, Massachusetts
No state requirement
Las Vegas, Nevada
No state requirement
Washington, District of Columbia
No figure; liability waivers void
Columbus, Ohio
No figure; lease controls
Newark, New Jersey
No state requirement
Detroit, Michigan
No state requirement
Charlotte, North Carolina
No figure; tenant picks carrier
Baltimore, Maryland
No figure; indemnity clauses void
Minneapolis, Minnesota
No state requirement
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
No figure; waiver voids lease
Kansas City, Missouri
No state requirement
Indianapolis, Indiana
No state requirement
Louisville, Kentucky
No figure; indemnity terms unenforceable

Figures are the state rule, or the stronger city ordinance where one exists. Verify the current law for your own situation before relying on it.

Understanding the Renters Insurance Clause

This page is for Nashville renters whose lease requires renters insurance. The clause usually does two things: it names a coverage amount you must keep in force for the whole lease term, and it says how the landlord must be listed on your policy.

Some clauses add a third thing, a promise to cover the landlord's own liability. That last sentence is the one Tennessee law speaks to, so read the whole insurance paragraph before you sign and raise anything you do not like in writing.

What renters assume

If my Nashville lease names a coverage amount, Tennessee law must require that amount.

What is actually true

No Tennessee section we read names a coverage amount. The figure in your lease is one your landlord chose, and you can question it before you sign like any other lease term.

Eleven of the 25 states on this chart land on the same $100,000 figure, and two write it into law: Oregon's cap on what a lease may demand, and California's waterbed policy under Civil Code 1940.5. In Tennessee it's an insurance-industry default your property manager pasted into the lease.

Clause decoder

Renters Insurance Clause Example - What the Wording Looks Like in Nashville, TN

The sample clause below is real lease language - a court quoted it word for word, and then ruled on it. What the judge decided is at the bottom of this block.

Real clause - quoted in a published court opinion

Find the equivalent paragraph in your own lease and read the two side by side. The wording will differ; the moving parts rarely do.

The Resident is responsible for the insurance of their personal property in the case of fire or other perils that would be covered by a resident’s renters insurance policy, as Dattel Realty Company’s insurance policies do not cover personal property of the resident. Resident is also responsible for liability that resident may incur as the result of a negligent action by the Resident, both as to individual apartment leased or common areas, including elevators, stairwells, swimming pool, corridors, grounds, parking and paved areas.

Quoted from the published opinion in Dattel Family Ltd. Partnership v. Wintz, 250 S.W.3d 883 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). Judicial opinions are not subject to copyright; the lease language is reproduced in limited part for commentary under 17 U.S.C. § 107.

What the 4 highlighted phrases mean
1

“The Resident is responsible for the insurance”

The promise, and the whole case is about how far it reaches. The Court of Appeals read it as a promise to insure the resident's own property and nothing more, and said so in terms worth keeping: while the lease states explicitly that the tenant is expected to obtain renter's insurance to cover her personal property, “it does not state that Wintz is obligated to obtain insurance for the Building.” Adopting the Sutton rule, the court treated her as an implied co-insured under the landlord's fire policy.

See the example
The Tennessee sections we read set no required liability coverage amount, so check the figure in your lease. Read the sentence for what it names - your property, or the premises, or the building - because in Tennessee that single word is what decides whether the landlord's insurer can come after you later.
Tenant-favourable“Resident shall insure Resident's own personal property; Resident has no duty to insure the building.”
What this lease said“The Resident is responsible for the insurance”
Landlord-favourable“Resident shall maintain insurance covering the Premises and the building against fire and all perils.”
2

“Dattel Realty Company’s insurance policies do not cover”

The landlord telling you what its own policy will not do for you. That is an accurate and even helpful disclosure - and the landlord's insurer then tried to use it as something more, arguing that the paragraph made the resident answerable for fire damage to the building. It failed. A statement about the limits of the landlord's coverage is not an express agreement that the tenant will insure the structure, and without that express agreement there is no subrogation against a residential tenant in Tennessee.

Tenant-favourable“Landlord's policies insure the building; Landlord's insurer waives subrogation against Resident.”
What this lease said“Dattel Realty Company’s insurance policies do not cover”
Landlord-favourable“Resident is not an insured under Landlord's policies and Landlord's insurer may recover from Resident.”
3

“Resident is also responsible for liability”

The liability half, and the half Tennessee actively polices. Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-203 voids a clause exculpating the landlord or requiring the tenant to indemnify it for that liability. So responsibility for liability the resident incurs through the resident's own negligence is one thing; a clause routing the landlord's liability onto the resident or the resident's policy is the thing the section strikes down. The word to look for in your own lease is whose negligence the sentence is about.

See the example
If your lease pairs a renters-insurance requirement with an indemnity or a hold-harmless sentence, read them as one unit, because that is how they operate. Section 66-28-203 voids the exculpation and the indemnity alike, so the question is not which label the sentence carries but whose liability it ends up moving.
Tenant-favourable“Resident is responsible only for liability arising from Resident's own acts or omissions.”
What this lease said“Resident is also responsible for liability”
Landlord-favourable“Resident shall indemnify Landlord against all claims arising in or about the Premises, however caused.”
4

“corridors, grounds, parking and paved areas”

Now the clause leaves the apartment. Shared ground is the landlord's to control and maintain, and it is where a landlord's own negligence tends to live - the unlit stair, the broken handrail, the step nobody fixed. The sentence stretches the resident's responsibility across all of it, and what § 66-28-203 does not allow is using words like these to make the resident carry liability that belongs to the landlord.

Tenant-favourable“Resident's responsibility in common areas is limited to Resident's own negligent acts.”
What this lease said“corridors, grounds, parking and paved areas”
Landlord-favourable“Resident is liable for all claims arising in common areas during the term, regardless of fault.”
What the court did with it

The tenant won, and the landlord's fire insurer recovered nothing. Adopting the Sutton rule for Tennessee, the Court of Appeals held that telling a resident she is responsible for insuring her own personal property - and that the landlord's policies do not cover it - is not an “express agreement to the contrary” making her liable to the landlord's insurer for fire damage to the building. In the court's words: “While the Lease Agreement states explicitly that Wintz is expected to obtain renter's insurance to cover her personal property, it does not state that Wintz is obligated to obtain insurance for the Building.” Absent that express language, a residential tenant is an implied co-insured under the landlord's fire policy, so the carrier had no right of subrogation against her. Summary judgment for the tenant was affirmed. The practical lesson: a sentence about your possessions is a sentence about your possessions, and it does not quietly become a promise to insure the building.

How this state's law treats this clause
This clause was litigated in Tennessee, and the tenant won. No section this guide reads in the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act carries a provision on tenant insurance, a landlord may require a policy by lease, and none sets a required liability coverage amount. Nashville cannot write its own rule either: Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-102 applies the state act in counties over 75,000 population under the 2010 census - which takes in Davidson County - and preempts local landlord-tenant ordinances. What the act does police is the line the second sentence of the clause below walks right up to: Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-203

One court, one lease, one state. That answer is not automatically yours, and your lease may be worded to land differently. Use this to know what to look for and what to ask - your state's tenant hotline or a local tenant attorney can answer it for your document.

Tennessee Law on Renters Insurance Clause

The law in Tennessee
  • The Tennessee Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act contains no provision on tenant insurance.
  • Section 66-28-203 voids clauses exculpating the landlord or requiring the tenant to indemnify it for that liability.
  • The act applies only in counties over 75,000 population under the 2010 census, which includes Nashville's Davidson County.
  • No Tennessee statute sets a required liability coverage amount.

Sources include Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-203 - statutes change; verify the current text for your situation.

No section we read in the Tennessee Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act mentions tenant insurance or sets a coverage amount. A requirement to carry a policy comes from your lease, and it binds you as a lease term once you sign.

Where the act does speak is Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-203. It voids clauses that excuse the landlord from its own liability or require you to indemnify it for that liability.

Look for words like indemnify, hold harmless or release near the insurance paragraph. A void clause does not bind you, even after you sign.

The act applies only in counties over 75,000 people under the 2010 census, and Davidson County is one of them. Check the current text of § 66-28-203 with the Tennessee General Assembly before you rely on it.

What's Specific to Nashville

Nashville cannot add its own rule. Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-102 preempts local landlord-tenant ordinances in Davidson County, so your lease and the state act set the terms.

In newer buildings around The Gulch, Wedgewood-Houston and Germantown, proof of coverage is often a move-in item, and the leasing office may offer a bundled policy. Compare an outside quote first, and read the perils list: standard renters policies exclude flood, which takes a separate policy.

Does the lease state a dollar coverage amount?

Good. A written figure shows exactly what you agreed to carry. A vague 'adequate insurance' line leaves the number to the landlord.

Does it ask for additional interest, not additional insured?

Additional interest only notifies the landlord if your policy lapses. It does not pull the landlord's exposure onto your coverage.

Does it require you to indemnify the landlord?

§ 66-28-203 voids clauses requiring you to indemnify the landlord for its own liability, however the paragraph words it.

Does it call the amount a Tennessee requirement?

No Tennessee section we read names a coverage amount for renters. The number came from whoever drafted the lease.

Sources

The law this guide relies on, and where to read it. Statutes change, so confirm the current text before you act on it.

  • Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-203, read on codes.findlaw.com. Tennessee publishes its official code through LexisNexis; there is no free government edition. FindLaw marks its copy of this section current as of January 2, 2024; confirm the current text with the Tennessee General Assembly before relying on it.

Red Flags to Watch Out For

  • Indemnity or hold harmless language

    Any sentence making you cover the landlord's own liability, losses or claims. § 66-28-203 voids it, whichever paragraph it sits in.

  • Landlord listed as additional insured

    That pulls your policy toward covering the landlord's exposure. Additional interest is the fairer ask: it only tells them when your coverage lapses.

  • No coverage amount written down

    'Adequate' insurance with no figure lets management set the bar after you move in. Ask for a number before you sign.

  • A required bundled policy

    A clause locking you into the leasing office's insurer. Ask in writing whether a policy from any licensed insurer qualifies.

  • Waiver of subrogation against the landlord

    This stops your insurer from recovering from the landlord after a loss the landlord caused. Read it against § 66-28-203 before you initial it.

Your Rights as a Nashville Tenant

  • No promise to cover the landlord's liability

    A clause excusing the landlord or making you indemnify it for its own liability is void under § 66-28-203, even if you signed it.

  • No state coverage amount to meet

    No Tennessee section we read sets a coverage amount. The figure in your lease is a term you can question before you sign.

  • The state act covers Davidson County

    The act reaches counties over 75,000 people. Davidson County is one, so Nashville renters get the § 66-28-203 protection.

  • Ask about your choice of insurer

    No Tennessee section we read requires the leasing office's bundled policy. Unless the lease names an insurer, ask whether any licensed insurer meets the clause.

What To Do - Step by Step

1

Find the insurance paragraph

Search the lease for insurance, liability, indemnify and hold harmless. Note the required amount and how the landlord must be listed on your policy.

2

Treat the amount as the landlord's ask

No Tennessee section we read names a coverage amount. If the figure seems high, ask in writing where it comes from.

3

Flag any indemnity wording

Mark every sentence making you answer for the landlord's own liability, losses or claims, and ask in writing for it to be removed (§ 66-28-203).

4

Compare outside quotes

Price a policy with two or three licensed insurers before taking the leasing office's bundled option, and ask about flood coverage.

5

Put changes in the lease

If the amount or wording changes, get it initialed into the lease itself, not promised in an email.

6

Get help if already signed

Contact the Legal Aid Society of Middle Tennessee and the Cumberlands or the Tennessee Division of Consumer Affairs. A void clause stays void after you sign.

Why renters trust LeaseDecoded

Read at the sourceEvery statute is read in its published text, on the state's own site where that site can be reached.
Real court rulingsLease wording on our pages is quoted from published court opinions, with what the judge decided.
Dated and re-checkedEach guide shows when it was last reviewed, and we correct it when the law changes.
Free, no sign-upEvery guide and calculator is free. It is not legal advice; each guide says where to get that.

Frequently Asked Questions

can my landlord require renters insurance in nashville
Yes. A Tennessee landlord may require renters insurance through a clause in your lease. That clause cannot make you indemnify the landlord for its own liability (Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-203).
how much renters insurance do i need in tennessee
Check the coverage amount in your lease's insurance clause. No Tennessee section we read sets one. $100,000 in personal liability is typical in Nashville leases, but that figure is the landlord's, not the state's.
does my renters policy cover the landlord's negligence
No, and the insurance clause cannot make you cover it. § 66-28-203 voids lease terms making you indemnify the landlord for its own liability. Your policy is for your belongings and damage you cause.
what if i don't buy renters insurance in nashville
You would be breaking the renters insurance clause in your lease. No Tennessee section we read sets a penalty for it or caps what a landlord-bought policy costs you. Read the clause for what follows: a fee, a policy billed to you, or a notice to fix it.

Was this guide helpful?Your answer is anonymous and helps us fix what is unclear.

Legal Disclaimer: This guide is for general educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Information reflects general Tennessee and Nashville law as of October 2026 but may not reflect recent changes. Consult a licensed attorney in Tennessee for advice about your specific situation.