LD
Written by
LeaseDecoded Research Team
Statutes verified against primary state sources
How this page is sourced
Every statute cited here was checked against the state's own published text before this page went live. Court decisions are quoted from the published opinion and linked to it, so you can read the original yourself.
Primary sourcesNot legal advice
Content verified against primary state statutes before publication Last updated: September 2026

Quick Summary - What You Need to Know

  • Tennessee's landlord-tenant act sets no coverage minimum, so the $100,000 in your Nashville lease is the landlord's number, not the state's.
  • Tenn. Code Ann. 66-28-203 voids any clause exculpating your landlord or making you indemnify it for its own liability.
  • Nashville legally cannot write its own rule - Tenn. Code Ann. 66-28-102 preempts local landlord-tenant ordinances in Davidson County.
  • The state act only reaches counties over 75,000 people, so Davidson County renters are covered and some rural neighbors are not.
  • Yes, a property manager can demand proof of coverage before handing you keys - skipping it is a real lease violation.

Understanding the Renters Insurance Clause

$100,000 typical
Typical required liability coverage in Nashville
Tennessee sets no minimum renters insurance - your Nashville lease can require it, but Tenn. Code Ann. 66-28-203 voids any clause making you cover the landlord's own liability.

A renters insurance clause makes you buy a policy - usually $100,000 in personal liability - and keep it active for the entire lease term. Most Nashville leases also want proof at move-in and notice if the policy ever lapses.

Tennessee has no statute on tenant insurance at all, so that dollar figure came from your landlord, not the legislature. What state law does control is the sentence underneath it: Tenn. Code Ann. 66-28-203 voids any clause that pushes the landlord's own liability onto you.

What renters assume

Renters assume the policy their lease forces them to buy is really there to protect the building, so any damage in the unit must somehow be covered by it.

What is actually true

Your liability coverage pays for damage you cause. Tenn. Code Ann. 66-28-203 voids any clause making you indemnify the landlord for the landlord's own liability, and no policy changes that.

Every state on this chart lands on the same $100,000 figure, and only California actually writes a number into law - the waterbed policy under Civil Code 1940.5. In Tennessee it's an insurance-industry default your property manager pasted into the lease.

Plain English Version

Renters insurance is a fence around your own stuff and your own mistakes. Your Nashville landlord can make you build that fence, but Tennessee law won't let him hide behind it when the problem was his.

Clause decoder

Renters Insurance Clause Example - What the Wording Looks Like in Nashville, TN

The sample clause below is real lease language - a court quoted it word for word, and then ruled on it. What the judge decided is at the bottom of this block.

Real clause - quoted in a published court opinion

Find the equivalent paragraph in your own lease and read the two side by side. The wording will differ; the moving parts rarely do.

The Resident is responsible for the insurance of their personal property in the case of fire or other perils that would be covered by a resident’s renters insurance policy, as Dattel Realty Company’s insurance policies do not cover personal property of the resident. Resident is also responsible for liability that resident may incur as the result of a negligent action by the Resident, both as to individual apartment leased or common areas, including elevators, stairwells, swimming pool, corridors, grounds, parking and paved areas.

Quoted from the published opinion in Dattel Family Ltd. Partnership v. Wintz, 250 S.W.3d 883 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). Judicial opinions are not subject to copyright; the lease language is reproduced in limited part for commentary under 17 U.S.C. § 107.

1

“The Resident is responsible for the insurance”

The promise, and the whole case is about how far it reaches. The Court of Appeals read it as a promise to insure the resident's own property and nothing more, and said so in terms worth keeping: while the lease states explicitly that the tenant is expected to obtain renter's insurance to cover her personal property, “it does not state that Wintz is obligated to obtain insurance for the Building.” Adopting the Sutton rule, the court treated her as an implied co-insured under the landlord's fire policy.

Because no Tennessee statute sets a required liability coverage amount, the figure in your lease is the figure that binds you. Read the sentence for what it names - your property, or the premises, or the building - because in Tennessee that single word is what decides whether the landlord's insurer can come after you later.
Tenant-favourable“Resident shall insure Resident's own personal property; Resident has no duty to insure the building.”
What this lease said“The Resident is responsible for the insurance”
Landlord-favourable“Resident shall maintain insurance covering the Premises and the building against fire and all perils.”
2

“Dattel Realty Company’s insurance policies do not cover”

The landlord telling you what its own policy will not do for you. That is an accurate and even helpful disclosure - and the landlord's insurer then tried to use it as something more, arguing that the paragraph made the resident answerable for fire damage to the building. It failed. A statement about the limits of the landlord's coverage is not an express agreement that the tenant will insure the structure, and without that express agreement there is no subrogation against a residential tenant in Tennessee.

Tenant-favourable“Landlord's policies insure the building; Landlord's insurer waives subrogation against Resident.”
What this lease said“Dattel Realty Company’s insurance policies do not cover”
Landlord-favourable“Resident is not an insured under Landlord's policies and Landlord's insurer may recover from Resident.”
3

“Resident is also responsible for liability”

The liability half, and the half Tennessee actively polices. Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-203 voids a clause exculpating the landlord or requiring the tenant to indemnify it for that liability. So responsibility for liability the resident incurs through the resident's own negligence is one thing; a clause routing the landlord's liability onto the resident or the resident's policy is the thing the section strikes down. The word to look for in your own lease is whose negligence the sentence is about.

If your lease pairs a renters-insurance requirement with an indemnity or a hold-harmless sentence, read them as one unit, because that is how they operate. Section 66-28-203 voids the exculpation and the indemnity alike, so the question is not which label the sentence carries but whose liability it ends up moving.
Tenant-favourable“Resident is responsible only for liability arising from Resident's own acts or omissions.”
What this lease said“Resident is also responsible for liability”
Landlord-favourable“Resident shall indemnify Landlord against all claims arising in or about the Premises, however caused.”
4

“corridors, grounds, parking and paved areas”

Now the clause leaves the apartment. Shared ground is the landlord's to control and maintain, and it is where a landlord's own negligence tends to live - the unlit stair, the broken handrail, the step nobody fixed. The sentence stretches the resident's responsibility across all of it, and what § 66-28-203 does not allow is using words like these to make the resident carry liability that belongs to the landlord.

Tenant-favourable“Resident's responsibility in common areas is limited to Resident's own negligent acts.”
What this lease said“corridors, grounds, parking and paved areas”
Landlord-favourable“Resident is liable for all claims arising in common areas during the term, regardless of fault.”
What the court did with it

The tenant won, and the landlord's fire insurer recovered nothing. Adopting the Sutton rule for Tennessee, the Court of Appeals held that telling a resident she is responsible for insuring her own personal property - and that the landlord's policies do not cover it - is not an “express agreement to the contrary” making her liable to the landlord's insurer for fire damage to the building. In the court's words: “While the Lease Agreement states explicitly that Wintz is expected to obtain renter's insurance to cover her personal property, it does not state that Wintz is obligated to obtain insurance for the Building.” Absent that express language, a residential tenant is an implied co-insured under the landlord's fire policy, so the carrier had no right of subrogation against her. Summary judgment for the tenant was affirmed. The practical lesson: a sentence about your possessions is a sentence about your possessions, and it does not quietly become a promise to insure the building.

This clause was litigated in Tennessee, and the tenant won. The Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act has no provision on tenant insurance, a landlord may require a policy by lease, and no Tennessee statute sets a required liability coverage amount. Nashville cannot write its own rule either: Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-102 applies the state act in counties over 75,000 population under the 2010 census - which takes in Davidson County - and preempts local landlord-tenant ordinances. What the act does police is the line the second sentence of the clause below walks right up to: Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-203

One court, one lease, one state. That answer is not automatically yours, and your lease may be worded to land differently. Use this to know what to look for and what to ask - your state's tenant hotline or a local tenant attorney can answer it for your document.

Tennessee Law on Renters Insurance Clause

The law in Tennessee
  • The Tennessee Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act contains no provision on tenant insurance.
  • Section 66-28-203 voids clauses exculpating the landlord or requiring the tenant to indemnify it for that liability.
  • The act applies only in counties over 75,000 population under the 2010 census, which includes Nashville's Davidson County.
  • No Tennessee statute sets a required liability coverage amount.

Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-203 - statutes change; verify the current text for your situation.

Tennessee law never names a coverage amount. The Tennessee Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act contains no provision on tenant insurance whatsoever, so the requirement lives entirely in your lease and binds you the moment you sign. The $100,000 most Nashville leases ask for is a landlord's number, and it's negotiable in the same way any other lease term is.

Where the act bites is Tenn. Code Ann. 66-28-203, which voids clauses exculpating the landlord or requiring you to indemnify it for that liability - the protection is that the clause simply doesn't bind you. Washington goes further and attaches up to two months' rent plus attorney fees to a knowing violation of RCW 59.18.230, while Georgia's O.C.G.A. 44-7-2 only strikes waivers of a short list of statutory rights. Tennessee also carries a quirk none of the others do: the act applies only in counties over 75,000 people under the 2010 census.

Tennessee Tenant Protections

Tenn. Code Ann. 66-28-203 voids any lease clause that exculpates your landlord or makes you indemnify it for its own liability, so an insurance requirement cannot be converted into a liability shield. Tennessee sets no statutory coverage minimum, which makes the dollar figure a negotiable lease term rather than a legal floor you must meet. The Tennessee Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act applies in counties over 75,000 people, and Davidson County clears that threshold, so Nashville renters get the act's protections in full.

What's Specific to Nashville

Typical required liability coverage

Same clause, 16 cities, different rules. Tap any city for its own guide.

Austin, Texas
$100,000 typical
Los Angeles, California
$100,000statutory
New York City, New York
$100,000 typical
Miami, Florida
$100,000 typical
Chicago, Illinois
$100,000 typical
Seattle, Washington
$100,000 typical
Denver, Colorado
$100,000 typical
Phoenix, Arizona
$100,000 typical
Atlanta, Georgia
$100,000 typical
Nashville, Tennessee
$100,000 typical
Portland, Oregon
$100,000 cap
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
No state requirement
Boston, Massachusetts
No state requirement
Las Vegas, Nevada
No state requirement
Washington, District of Columbia
No figure; liability waivers void
Columbus, Ohio
No figure; lease controls

Figures are the state rule, or the stronger city ordinance where one exists. Verify the current law for your own situation before relying on it.

Nashville adds nothing on renters insurance, and it isn't allowed to. Tenn. Code Ann. 66-28-102 applies the state act in counties over 75,000 people and preempts local landlord-tenant ordinances, so Metro Council can't cap your required coverage or ban a bad clause. Your lease plus the state act is the whole rulebook in Davidson County.

In practice the requirement is near-universal in the towers that went up around The Gulch, Wedgewood-Houston and Germantown, where proof of coverage is a move-in checklist item and the leasing office will happily sell you a bundled policy. Shop it first - an independent quote usually beats the bundled rate. And read the perils list closely in a city that's taken tornadoes and Cumberland River flooding: standard renters policies exclude flood, which is a separate policy entirely.

Does the lease state a dollar coverage amount?

It should. Tennessee sets no minimum, so a vague 'adequate insurance' line lets the property manager decide the number after you've moved in.

Does it say additional interest, not additional insured?

Additional interest is the fair version - it only notifies the landlord if your policy lapses, without pulling their exposure onto your coverage.

Does it require you to indemnify the landlord?

Red flag. Tenn. Code Ann. 66-28-203 voids any clause making you cover the landlord's own liability, however the paragraph is worded.

Can the landlord force-place a policy on you?

Watch that. Force-placed coverage billed back to you usually runs far above market, and Tennessee sets no cap on what they charge.

Sources

The law this guide relies on, and where to read it. Statutes change, so confirm the current text before you act on it.

  • Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-203, read on codes.findlaw.com. Tennessee publishes its official code through LexisNexis; there is no free government edition. FindLaw marks its copy of this section current as of January 2, 2024; confirm the current text with the Tennessee General Assembly before relying on it.

Red Flags to Watch Out For

  • Indemnity language buried in the clause

    Any sentence making you cover the landlord's liability, losses or claims. Tenn. Code Ann. 66-28-203 voids it, no matter which paragraph it hides in.

  • Landlord listed as additional insured

    That drags your policy toward covering their exposure. Additional interest is the legitimate ask - it only tells them when your coverage lapses.

  • No coverage amount written down

    'Sufficient' or 'adequate' insurance with no figure lets management raise the bar mid-tenancy. Tennessee sets no minimum, so the lease must say the number.

  • Mandatory bundled policy through management

    A clause locking you into the leasing office's insurer. Ask in writing whether any licensed insurer qualifies - an outside quote is usually cheaper.

  • Waiver of subrogation against the landlord

    This stops your insurer from recovering from the landlord after a loss they caused. Read it against 66-28-203 before you initial that page.

Your Rights as a Nashville Tenant

  • No statutory minimum to hit

    Tennessee's act sets no coverage floor, so the amount is a lease term you can question and negotiate at signing - not a legal requirement.

  • Their liability stays theirs

    Tenn. Code Ann. 66-28-203 voids any clause exculpating your landlord or making you indemnify it for its own liability. Signing it doesn't make it enforceable.

  • The state act covers Davidson County

    The act reaches counties over 75,000 people, so Nashville renters get its protections in full - including the ban on exculpatory clauses.

  • Your own choice of insurer

    No Tennessee law forces you into the leasing office's bundled policy. Unless the lease says otherwise, comparable coverage from any licensed insurer satisfies the clause.

What To Do - Step by Step

1

Find the insurance paragraph

Search the lease for 'insurance,' 'liability,' 'indemnify' and 'hold harmless.' Note the required amount and how the landlord is to be listed on the policy.

2

Check the required amount

Tennessee sets no minimum, so whatever number appears is purely the landlord's ask. $100,000 in personal liability is the standard Nashville figure.

3

Flag any indemnity wording

Mark every sentence making you responsible for the landlord's liability, losses or claims. Tenn. Code Ann. 66-28-203 voids that language outright.

4

Get outside quotes first

Price a policy with two or three licensed insurers before accepting the leasing office's bundled option, and ask what the flood exclusion means for your building.

5

Put changes in the lease

If you negotiate the amount down or swap 'additional insured' for 'additional interest,' get it initialed into the lease itself - not promised in an email.

6

Get help if already signed

Contact the Legal Aid Society of Middle Tennessee and the Cumberlands or the Tennessee Division of Consumer Affairs. A void clause stays void even after you sign.

Frequently Asked Questions

can my landlord require renters insurance in nashville
Yes. Tennessee has no statute on tenant insurance, so a renters insurance requirement is an ordinary lease term and fully enforceable once you sign. No state law caps the coverage amount.
how much renters insurance do i need in tennessee
Whatever your lease says - Tennessee sets no minimum. Most Nashville leases ask for $100,000 in personal liability, an insurance-industry default rather than a number written into state law.
does my renters policy cover the landlord's negligence
No, and no lease can force it to. Tenn. Code Ann. 66-28-203 voids any clause making you indemnify the landlord for its own liability. Your policy covers your belongings and damage you cause.
what if i don't buy renters insurance in nashville
It's a lease violation, not a legal one. Tennessee has no insurance statute, so the consequence comes from the lease - typically a fee, a force-placed policy billed to you, or a cure notice.
where can i read tenn. code ann. § 66-28-203 for myself
The section is Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-203. Tennessee publishes its official code through LexisNexis; there is no free government edition. Statutes are amended, so check the text as it reads on the day you need it.
what is the typical required liability coverage in nashville
Tennessee: $100,000 typical. Tennessee has no renters insurance statute; a landlord may require it by lease but cannot make the tenant indemnify the landlord for its own liability. That comes from Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-203.
does nashville add its own rule or does tennessee law decide
Nashville cannot add its own rule: Tenn. Code Ann. 66-28-102 applies the state act in counties over 75,000 including Davidson County and preempts local landlord-tenant ordinances.
how does tennessee compare with other states on this
Tennessee: $100,000 typical. Pennsylvania: No state requirement. The chart above on this page shows every city side by side.
Legal Disclaimer: This guide is for general educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Information reflects general Tennessee and Nashville law as of September 2026 but may not reflect recent changes. Consult a licensed attorney in Tennessee for advice about your specific situation.