No figure; indemnity clauses unenforceable
Typical required liability coverage in Oklahoma City
No. Our record of Oklahoma's Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, with parts of its Insurance Code, finds no requirement that a tenant carry renters insurance and no coverage figure. That leaves your lease to set one. Under Okla. Stat. tit. 41, § 113(A)(4) and (B), a lease term excusing or shifting liability for how the unit is run or maintained is unenforceable.

Quick Summary - What You Need to Know

  • Our record of Oklahoma law finds no renters insurance requirement and no coverage figure for tenants.
  • A term excusing, limiting or indemnifying liability for upkeep of the unit is unenforceable (§ 113(A)(4), (B)).
  • A landlord who knows of flooding in the past five years must disclose it in writing (§ 113a(A)).
  • Serious fire damage you did not cause lets you leave, giving written notice within one week (§ 122(A)).
  • Our record of the Oklahoma City Municipal Code finds no renters insurance rule for tenants.

Count it for your dates

7 days: when does it end?

Day 7 falls on

What it means: Give the landlord written notice by this date to end the rental agreement. Applies to a tenant whose unit is substantially impaired by fire or other casualty that the tenant, family, pet or guest did not deliberately or negligently cause; a tenant who stays instead pays reduced rent (Okla. Stat. tit. 41, § 122(A)). Calendar arithmetic only; check how the section counts days before you rely on a date.

Copy and send: Before you sign the lease, after reading the insurance clause and the sentences around it

Questions about the insurance clause

Fill in the brackets and keep a copy of what you send.

How Oklahoma compares

Typical required liability coverage, state by state

Typical required liability coverage by stateEach square is a state; Oklahoma is outlined.Alabama: guide coming soonALAlaska: guide coming soonAKArizonaAZ$100kArkansas: guide coming soonARCaliforniaCA$100kColoradoCO$100kConnecticut: guide coming soonCTDelaware: guide coming soonDEDistrict of ColumbiaDCNo figureFloridaFL$100kGeorgiaGA$100kHawaii: guide coming soonHIIdaho: guide coming soonIDIllinoisIL$100kIndianaINNo figureIowa: guide coming soonIAKansas: guide coming soonKSKentuckyKYNo figureLouisiana: guide coming soonLAMaine: guide coming soonMEMarylandMDNo figureMassachusettsMANo figureMichiganMINo figureMinnesotaMNNo figureMississippi: guide coming soonMSMissouriMONo figureMontana: guide coming soonMTNebraska: guide coming soonNENevadaNVNo figureNew Hampshire: guide coming soonNHNew JerseyNJNo figureNew Mexico: guide coming soonNMNew YorkNY$100kNorth CarolinaNCNo figureNorth Dakota: guide coming soonNDOhioOHNo figureOklahomaOKNo figureOregonOR$100kPennsylvaniaPANo figureRhode Island: guide coming soonRISouth Carolina: guide coming soonSCSouth Dakota: guide coming soonSDTennesseeTN$100kTexasTX$100kUtah: guide coming soonUTVermont: guide coming soonVTVirginia: guide coming soonVAWashingtonWA$100kWest Virginia: guide coming soonWVWisconsinWINo figureWyoming: guide coming soonWY

$100kNo figureGuide coming soonYou are here

See all 26 cities as a chart

Typical required liability coverage

Same clause, 26 cities, different rules. Tap any city for its own guide.

Austin, Texas
$100,000 typical
Los Angeles, California
$100,000statutory
New York City, New York
$100,000 typical
Miami, Florida
$100,000 typical
Chicago, Illinois
$100,000 typical
Seattle, Washington
$100,000 typical
Denver, Colorado
$100,000 typical
Phoenix, Arizona
$100,000 typical
Atlanta, Georgia
$100,000 typical
Nashville, Tennessee
$100,000 typical
Portland, Oregon
$100,000 cap
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
No state requirement
Boston, Massachusetts
No state requirement
Las Vegas, Nevada
No state requirement
Washington, District of Columbia
No figure; liability waivers void
Columbus, Ohio
No figure; lease controls
Newark, New Jersey
No state requirement
Detroit, Michigan
No state requirement
Charlotte, North Carolina
No figure; tenant picks carrier
Baltimore, Maryland
No figure; indemnity clauses void
Minneapolis, Minnesota
No state requirement
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
No figure; waiver voids lease
Kansas City, Missouri
No state requirement
Indianapolis, Indiana
No state requirement
Louisville, Kentucky
No figure; indemnity terms unenforceable
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
No figure; indemnity clauses unenforceable

Figures are the state rule, or the stronger city ordinance where one exists. Verify the current law for your own situation before relying on it.

Understanding the Renters Insurance Clause

This page is for Oklahoma City renters whose lease tells them to buy renters insurance and who want to know what Oklahoma law says about it. The dollar figure is only half of the clause.

The sentence beside it may say the landlord answers for none of your losses, or ask you to cover the landlord's own liability. That is where Oklahoma law speaks, so read those sentences closely before you sign, and raise any you do not like in writing.

What renters assume

A lease line saying the landlord is not responsible for my property means the landlord never pays, whatever happens.

What is actually true

Okla. Stat. tit. 41, § 113(A)(4) bars a lease term agreeing to the "exculpation, limitation or indemnification" of liability for acts or omissions in operating or maintaining the unit. § 113(B) says such a provision "is unenforceable."

Of the 26 rows in the comparison further down this page, eleven are drawn at $100,000 and fifteen have no bar. Oklahoma City is one of the fifteen.

Eight of them read No state requirement: Philadelphia, Boston, Las Vegas, Newark, Detroit, Minneapolis, Kansas City and Indianapolis.

The other seven carry a no-figure label with a note. Washington notes void liability waivers, Baltimore void indemnity clauses, Milwaukee a waiver that voids the lease and Louisville indemnity terms that are unenforceable.

Columbus notes the lease in control and Charlotte the tenant's choice of carrier. Oklahoma City's label, No figure; indemnity clauses unenforceable, rests on Okla. Stat. tit. 41, § 113(A)(4).

That is a rule about the sentence that shifts liability, not the size of a policy, and a scale drawn in coverage dollars has nowhere to put it.

Clause decoder

Renters Insurance Clause Example - What the Wording Looks Like in Oklahoma City, OK

The sample clause below is real lease language - a court quoted it word for word, and then ruled on it. What the judge decided is at the bottom of this block.

Real clause - quoted in a published court opinion

Find the equivalent paragraph in your own lease and read the two side by side. The wording will differ; the moving parts rarely do.

THE INSURANCE IS TO PROVIDE PROTECTION FOR YOUR PERSONAL POSSESSIONS. CHATHAM HILLS APARTMENTS IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR PROPERTY IN CASE OF AN ACCIDENT.

Quoted from the published opinion in Whitledge v. Klein, 348 Ill. App. 3d 1059 (Ill. App. Ct. 4th Dist. 2004). Judicial opinions are not subject to copyright; the lease language is reproduced in limited part for commentary under 17 U.S.C. § 107.

What the 4 highlighted phrases mean
1

“PROTECTION”

The lease calls the policy protection, and in Oklahoma the demand for it comes from the lease: our record of Title 41, with a text search of Title 36, finds no requirement to carry renters insurance and no coverage amount. The act's own protection for belongings is a disclosure. Under Okla. Stat. tit. 41, § 113a(A), a landlord who knows the premises “has been flooded within the past five (5) years” must say so “prominently and in writing” in any written rental agreement.

See the example
Failure entitles the tenant “to recover the personal property damages sustained by the tenant from flooding of the premises.” Ask before signing whether the unit has flooded, and keep the signed lease, since the disclosure has to be in it.
Tenant-favourable“Landlord states in this lease whether the premises have flooded in the past five years”
What this lease said“PROTECTION”
Landlord-favourable“Tenant accepts the premises as is and waives any claim for flood damage to personal property”
2

“FOR YOUR PERSONAL POSSESSIONS”

A renters policy covers what you own. Oklahoma's casualty section covers the home and the money you paid for it. Under § 122(A), a fire or other casualty may substantially impair enjoyment of the unit without the tenant, family, pet or guest deliberately or negligently causing it. The tenant may then vacate and give written notice “within one (1) week thereafter” to end the agreement.

See the example
§ 122(B) then requires the landlord to return recoverable deposits and “all prepaid and unearned rent.” If you stay, rent is reduced “in proportion to the diminution in the fair rental value”. Write the notice the week you leave, because the section counts that week from vacating.
Tenant-favourable“If fire makes the unit unusable, Tenant may end the lease and receive all prepaid rent and the deposit”
What this lease said“FOR YOUR PERSONAL POSSESSIONS”
Landlord-favourable“Tenant’s sole remedy for fire or casualty is Tenant’s own insurance; rent continues in full”
3

“APARTMENTS IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR PROPERTY”

This is the sentence to set beside Okla. Stat. tit. 41, § 113(A)(4). A rental agreement may not provide that either party agrees to the “exculpation, limitation or indemnification of any liability arising under law for damages or injuries to persons or property”. That covers acts or omissions in the operation or maintenance of the dwelling unit or premises, and § 113(B) says such a provision “is unenforceable.”

See the example
The sentence does not say what caused the loss, and that is where to look. Whitledge applied Illinois law, which does not bind an Oklahoma court, but its reasoning carries over: a disclaimer that moves a landlord's own maintenance failure onto you is the kind of term § 113(A)(4) describes. A loss with no link to how the unit is run or maintained is a different question.
Tenant-favourable“Landlord remains responsible for loss caused by Landlord’s own acts or failure to maintain the premises”
What this lease said“APARTMENTS IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR PROPERTY”
Landlord-favourable“Landlord is not responsible for any loss to Tenant’s property from any cause, including Landlord’s failure to repair”
4

“IN CASE OF AN ACCIDENT”

An accident can start on either side of the lease, and Oklahoma's subsection is written for both: it speaks of the acts or omissions “of either party, their agents, servants or employees”. For damage the tenant causes, the sections we read rely on a duty and the deposit. § 127 requires the tenant not to “deliberately or negligently destroy, deface, damage, impair or remove any part of the premises”.

See the example
§ 115(B) lets the landlord apply the deposit to “the amount of damages which the landlord has suffered by reason of the tenant's noncompliance”, and § 115(G) says the section “does not preclude the landlord or tenant from recovering other damages”. A policy with liability cover is one way to meet that exposure, and the lease is where any duty to carry one comes from.
Tenant-favourable“Nothing in this clause limits Landlord’s liability for an accident caused by Landlord’s acts or omissions”
What this lease said“IN CASE OF AN ACCIDENT”
Landlord-favourable“Tenant shall hold Landlord harmless for any accident on the premises, however caused”
What the court did with it

The endorsement did not stop the tenants' lawsuit. Answering certified questions, the Illinois Appellate Court held that section 1 of the Illinois Landlord and Tenant Act (765 ILCS 705/1) voids not only exculpatory lease clauses but also, “by clear and necessary implication,” lease language that shifts the landlord's own negligence onto the tenant through a required renters-insurance or indemnity arrangement. The court's reason is the sentence to remember: “an indemnity clause in a lease has the same effect as a lease exculpatory clause: the landlord does not pay.” So the renters-insurance endorsement did not require dismissal of the tenants' fire-damage negligence suit, and the tenants' insurers, standing in the tenants' shoes, got the same statutory protection the tenants had. For a renter the point is narrow and useful: being made to buy a policy is one thing, and being made to buy the landlord's way out of its own negligence is another.

How this state's law treats this clause
Our record of Oklahoma's landlord-tenant act, with a text search of its Insurance Code, finds no renters insurance requirement and no coverage figure, which leaves the lease as the source of any amount. What the act reaches is the disclaimer beside the policy: a term exculpating, limiting or indemnifying liability for acts or omissions in operating or maintaining the unit is unenforceable. Confirm the current text before relying on it: Okla. Stat. tit. 41, § 113(A)(4); Okla. Stat. tit. 41, § 113(B); Okla. Stat. tit. 41, § 113a; Okla. Stat. tit. 41, § 122; Okla. Stat. tit. 41, § 127; Okla. Stat. tit. 41, § 115(B); Okla. Stat. tit. 41, § 115(G); Okla. Stat. tit. 11, § 14-101.1

One court, one lease, one state. That answer is not automatically yours, and your lease may be worded to land differently. Use this to know what to look for and what to ask - your state's tenant hotline or a local tenant attorney can answer it for your document.

Oklahoma Law on Renters Insurance Clause

The law in Oklahoma
  • A lease cannot shift liability for negligent upkeep.
    Read the law's wordsOkla. Stat. tit. 41, § 113(A)(4) says a rental agreement may not provide that either party "Agrees to the exculpation, limitation or indemnification of any liability arising under law for damages or injuries to persons or property caused by or resulting from the acts or omissions of either party, their agents, servants or employees in the operation or maintenance of the dwelling unit or the premises of which it is a part". Section 113(B) says such a provision "is unenforceable."
  • Flood history has to be disclosed, and the remedy covers the tenant's belongings.
    Read the law's wordsSection 113a(A) says that if the premises "has been flooded within the past five (5) years and such fact is known to the landlord", the landlord must say so "prominently and in writing" in any written rental agreement, and failure entitles the tenant "to recover the personal property damages sustained by the tenant from flooding of the premises."
  • Fire or other casualty can end the lease.
    Read the law's wordsUnder § 122(A), if the unit is damaged by "fire or other casualty" so that enjoyment is substantially impaired, and the tenant, family, pet or guest did not deliberately or negligently cause it, the tenant may vacate and give written notice "within one (1) week thereafter" to end the agreement, or stay and pay rent reduced "in proportion to the diminution in the fair rental value". Section 122(B) then requires the landlord to return recoverable deposits and "all prepaid and unearned rent."
  • Damage a tenant causes is backed in the sections we read by the deposit and a claim for damages, not a policy.
    Read the law's wordsSection 127 requires the tenant not to "deliberately or negligently destroy, deface, damage, impair or remove any part of the premises". Section 115(B) lets the landlord apply the deposit to "the amount of damages which the landlord has suffered by reason of the tenant's noncompliance", and § 115(G) says the section "does not preclude the landlord or tenant from recovering other damages".

Sources include Okla. Stat. tit. 41, § 113(A)(4); Okla. Stat. tit. 41, § 113(B); Okla. Stat. tit. 41, § 113a; Okla. Stat. tit. 41, § 122; Okla. Stat. tit. 41, § 127; Okla. Stat. tit. 41, § 115(B); Okla. Stat. tit. 41, § 115(G); Okla. Stat. tit. 11, § 14-101.1 - statutes change; verify the current text for your situation.

No section we read in Oklahoma's Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, Okla. Stat. tit. 41, or in parts of Title 36, the Insurance Code, requires a tenant to carry renters insurance or names a coverage amount. That leaves the paragraph you signed as the document that answers it. Four rules bear on this clause:

  • No exculpation or indemnity (§ 113(A)(4) and (B)). A lease term by which either party agrees to excuse, limit or indemnify liability for acts or omissions in operating or maintaining the unit is unenforceable.
  • Flood disclosure (§ 113a(A)). A landlord who knows the premises flooded within the past five years must say so prominently in any written rental agreement. Failure lets the tenant recover flood damage to personal property.
  • Fire or other casualty (§ 122). If a casualty the tenant, family, pet or guest did not deliberately or negligently cause substantially impairs the unit, the tenant may vacate and end the agreement with written notice within one week, or stay at reduced rent. Recoverable deposits and prepaid, unearned rent come back.
  • Damage you cause (§§ 127, 115(B), 115(G)). You must not deliberately or negligently damage the premises. The landlord may apply the deposit to damages from your noncompliance, and other damages claims stay open.

Check the current text on oscn.net before you rely on it.

What's Specific to Oklahoma City

Our record of the Oklahoma City Municipal Code finds no renters insurance requirement for tenants. No section in our record of that code uses "renters insurance" or "renter insurance", and Chapter 24, the Housing and Property Maintenance Code, does not mention insurance.

Okla. Stat. tit. 11, § 14-101.1(A) bars a city ordinance that regulates the amount of rent, and we take no position on how it would apply to any city insurance rule. The published code may lag recent legislation, so confirm it before relying on the absence of a city rule.

Does the lease say plainly what coverage it wants?

Good. A clause that names the amount and the kind of policy shows exactly what you agreed to carry.

Does the lease answer the flood question?

§ 113a(A) requires a landlord who knows of flooding within the past five years to say so "prominently and in writing" in the lease.

Does the lease excuse the landlord from harm caused by how the unit is maintained?

§ 113(B) makes a term excusing or limiting liability for operating or maintaining the unit unenforceable.

Does a hold harmless sentence make you stand behind the landlord's upkeep?

§ 113(A)(4) covers indemnification as well as exculpation, for the acts or omissions of either party. Read the sentence against those words.

Sources

The law this guide relies on, and where to read it. Statutes change, so confirm the current text before you act on it.

Red Flags to Watch Out For

  • A blanket disclaimer for your property

    A term excusing or limiting liability for property damage from how the unit is operated or maintained is unenforceable under § 113(A)(4) and (B).

  • An indemnity for the landlord's upkeep

    § 113(A)(4) also bars agreeing to indemnify that liability. A hold harmless sentence that asks you to cover maintenance failures is worth a written question.

  • A coverage figure credited to Oklahoma law

    No section we read in Okla. Stat. tit. 41 or in parts of Title 36 sets a coverage figure. Ask the landlord, in writing, which section it means.

  • No flood disclosure on a unit that flooded

    If the landlord knew of flooding within the past five years and the written lease is silent, § 113a(A) lets you recover flood damage to your belongings.

  • An Oklahoma City rule cited for coverage

    No section in our record of the Oklahoma City code uses "renters insurance". Ask which section the lease means, and read the current code.

Your Rights as a Oklahoma City Tenant

  • No waiver of liability for upkeep

    A term excusing or limiting liability for acts or omissions in operating or maintaining the unit is unenforceable (§ 113(A)(4), (B)).

  • No indemnity for that liability

    The same rule reaches an agreement to indemnify that liability, whichever party agrees to it (§ 113(A)(4)).

  • Flood damage to your belongings

    A landlord who knew of flooding within five years and left it out of a written lease leaves you able to recover personal property damages (§ 113a(A)).

  • A way out after a fire

    After a casualty you did not deliberately or negligently cause, written notice within one week ends the agreement, and prepaid, unearned rent comes back (§ 122).

What To Do - Step by Step

1

List what the policy must cover

Note the coverage amount, the kind of policy and anyone the lease wants named on it as an additional insured.

2

Find the sentence about who is not responsible

Read it beside § 113(A)(4). A term excusing, limiting or indemnifying liability for operating or maintaining the unit is unenforceable.

3

Ask about flooding before you sign

Ask in writing whether the unit flooded in the past five years, and keep the answer with your copy of the lease.

4

Keep the declarations page with the lease

Store the policy's declarations page beside the lease, and answer any request for proof of coverage in writing with a dated copy.

5

After a fire, put notice in writing within a week

If you leave after a fire you did not deliberately or negligently cause, send the landlord written notice within one week (§ 122(A)).

6

Object in writing, then get help

Name the clause and § 113(B) in a dated note to the landlord. If that goes nowhere, a legal aid office is the next call.

Why renters trust LeaseDecoded

Read at the sourceEvery statute is read in its published text, on the state's own site where that site can be reached.
Real court rulingsLease wording on our pages is quoted from published court opinions, with what the judge decided.
Dated and re-checkedEach guide shows when it was last reviewed, and we correct it when the law changes.
Free, no sign-upEvery guide and calculator is free. It is not legal advice; each guide says where to get that.

Frequently Asked Questions

is renters insurance required by law in oklahoma city
Not by the sections we read. Our record of Okla. Stat. tit. 41, parts of Title 36 and the Oklahoma City code finds no renters insurance requirement and no coverage amount. That leaves the lease you signed as the document that sets any requirement.
can an oklahoma lease say the landlord is not responsible for my property
Not for liability from how the unit is run or maintained. Okla. Stat. tit. 41, § 113(A)(4) bars a lease term that excuses, limits or indemnifies liability for those acts or omissions, and § 113(B) makes such a term unenforceable.
does my oklahoma landlord have to tell me if the apartment flooded
Yes, if the landlord knows. Under Okla. Stat. tit. 41, § 113a(A), flooding within the past five years must appear prominently and in writing in any written rental agreement. If it does not, you can recover the personal property damages the flooding caused.
what happens to my lease after a fire in oklahoma
If a fire or other casualty you, your family, pet or guest did not deliberately or negligently cause substantially impairs the unit, Title 41, § 122(A) lets you vacate with written notice within one week, or stay at reduced rent. § 122(B) returns recoverable deposits and prepaid, unearned rent.

Was this guide helpful?Your answer is anonymous and helps us fix what is unclear.

Legal Disclaimer: This guide is for general educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Information reflects general Oklahoma and Oklahoma City law as of October 2026 but may not reflect recent changes. Consult a licensed attorney in Oklahoma for advice about your specific situation.